Eligible workers at Apple, Google, Intel and Adobe could receive an average of about $5,200 apiece as part of a proposed $415 million settlement in a law suit against Apple, Google and other tech firms who had formed a cartel to prevent workers leaving for better-paying jobs.

If the federal judge hearing the case approves the deal filed Thursday, the eligible workers at Apple, Google, Intel and Adobe would receive an average of about $5,200 apiece. They could have received an average of more than $100,000 apiece had the case gone to trial and resulted in trebled damages of $9 billion.

The settlement filed Thursday in a San Jose, California, federal court revises a $324.5 million agreement that U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh rejected as inadequate five months ago. Koh indicated that she believed the roughly 64,000 workers in the case should be paid at least $380 million, including attorney fees.

The lawsuit, filed in 2011, sought $3 billion in damages that could have been tripled under U.S. antitrust law. Attorneys for the workers decided to settle after concluding it would have been difficult to prove the alleged conspiracy to a jury.

Reuters noted that Koh rejected the previous settlement as too low after one of the named plaintiffs objected.

That worker will support the new agreement, according to the New York Times.

Intuit Inc., Pixar Animation Studios and Lucasfilm also participated in the no-poaching ring. Those three companies reached a $20 million settlement that Koh approved last year.

“Apple and Google workers got proportionally less than Disney workers, Koh wrote, even though plaintiff lawyers had ‘much more leverage’ against Apple and Google, Reuters reported. The judge said a similar agreement against the other firms “would need to total at least $380 million.”

The companies said they would file a detailed explanation of the proposed settlement in the near future at which Koh will decide whether to accept it. 

If Koh approves the latest settlement, it would avoid a potentially embarrassing trial over claims that Apple Inc., Google Inc., Intel Corp. and Adobe Systems Inc. secretly agreed not to recruit each other’s employees from 2005 to 2009.

The alleged collusion stopped after the U.S. Justice Department opened an investigation that culminated with an antitrust complaint being filed against Apple, Google and the other participating companies in 2010. The Justice Department’s case was settled without the companies admitting any guilt or paying any fines.

The evidence gathered in the ensuing class-action lawsuit has exposed Apple and Google emails that have cast some of their top executives in an unflattering light.

Apple’s late CEO Steve Jobs is depicted as the conniving ringleader of a scheme designed to minimize the chances that the top computer programmers and other talented employees would defect to other technology companies. The lawsuit contends the secret “no-poaching” agreements orchestrated by Jobs suppressed the wages of the employees, many of whom were already making more than $100,000 annually.

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, who was on Apple’s board at the time that the alleged collusion began, sometimes took drastic actions to make sure his company didn’t cross Jobs. In 2007, Schmidt, in a bid to keep Jobs happy, fired a Google recruiter for contacting an Apple engineer, according to internal emails.

Both Apple and Google declined to comment on the new settlement. As they did in the Justice Department’s investigation, they have denied wrongdoing.

The workers’ attorneys are seeking fees of up to $82.3 million in the settlement, the same amount they wanted in the previous agreement.